An argument on the effectivity of treatment based strategies for prisoner reformation

Photograph by Jim Harrison Western and his team of researchers meet regularly to discuss their work. Photograph by Jim Harrison [extra: Extra] Read more about the Harvard courses and programs that bring students into contact with current and former prisoners.

An argument on the effectivity of treatment based strategies for prisoner reformation

Background Philosophical reflection on punishment has helped cause, and is itself partially an effect of, developments in the understanding of punishment that have taken place outside the academy in the real world of political life.

A generation ago sociologists, criminologists, and penologists became disenchanted with the rehabilitative effects as measured by reductions in offender recidivism of programs conducted in prisons aimed at this end Martinson This disenchantment led to skepticism about the feasibility of the very aim of rehabilitation within the framework of existing penal philosophy.

To these were added skepticism over the deterrent effects of punishment whether special, aimed at the offender, or general, aimed at the public and as an effective goal to pursue in punishment.

That left, apparently, only two possible rational aims to pursue in the practice of punishment under law: Social defense through incarceration, and retributivism.

Public policy advocates insisted that the best thing to do with convicted offenders was to imprison them, in the belief that the most economical way to reduce crime was to incapacitate known recidivists via incarceration, or even death Wilson Whatever else may be true, this aim at least has been achieved on a breathtaking scale, as the enormous growth in the number of state and federal prisoners in the United States some 2.

At the same time that enthusiasm for incarceration and incapacitation was growing as the preferred methods of punishment, dissatisfaction with the indeterminate prison sentence—crucial to any rehabilitative scheme because of the discretion it grants to penal officials—on grounds of fairness led policy analysts to search for another approach.

Fairness in sentencing seemed most likely to be achievable if a criminal sentence was of a determinate rather than indeterminate duration Allen But even determinate sentencing would not be fair unless the sentences so authorized were the punishments that convicted offenders deserved.

Aside from being an impractical goal, it is morally defective for two reasons: The oddity of a theory that affirms having and exercising a right to be punished has not escaped notice. Second, justice or fairness in punishment is the essential task of sentencing, and a just sentence takes its character from the culpability of the offender and the harm the crime caused the victim and society Cardvon HirschNozick In short, just punishment is retributive punishment.

What is drug addiction?

Philosophers reached these conclusions because they argued that there were irreducible retributive aspects to punishment—in the very definition of the practice, in the norms governing justice in punishment, and in the purpose of the practice as well. As a result, the ground was cut out from under the dominant penal policy of mid-century, the indeterminate sentence in the service of the rehabilitative ideal for offenders behind bars.

Probation as the essential nonincarcerative alternative sanction received an expanded role, but release on parole came to a virtual end.

In its place but as it turned out, only in theory was uniform determinate sentencing, which would avoid the follies of unachievable rehabilitative goals and ensure both incapacitation and even-handed justice for all offenders.

This was, of course, before the political process distorted these aims. Not all admirers of justice in punishment supported determinate sentencing. The doctrine has not been without its critics, both in theory and in practice Zimring But to date, no alternative approach shows any signs of supplementing the just deserts sentencing philosophy—no matter how preposterous in practice the claim that a given punitive sentence is justly deserved may be in most cases.

WHY HELP OFFENDERS? ARGUMENTS FOR REHABILITATION AS A PENAL STRATEGY treatment of offenders and as a means of incapacitation. This trend, variously identified arguments based on the effectiveness of rehabilitation require empirical evidence of the changes it produces in offending behaviour, whilst arguments. Prisoners’ Rights, Alternative Forms of Correction and Strategies. Tamika Henley CRJ Corrections Instructor: Kirsten Pickering Date January 26, Correctional Agency is an organization that is in charge of supervision and administration of already sentenced criminal. now focuses on evidence-based recidivism-reduction initiatives in addition to promoting the cost-effective that incorporated the following strategies and have contributed to the state’s reduction in recidivism: Investing in community-based treatment. In , the state reclassified certain substance use and possession offenses, reducing.

There has been a third development concurrent with the two outlined above, far less influential in the formation of actual penalty policy even if it is of equal theoretical importance Harding We refer to the reconceptualization of the practice of punishment arising from the work of Michel Foucault in the mids.

Foucault invited us to view the practice of punishment under law as subject to general forces in society that reflect the dominant forms of social and political power—the power to threaten, coerce, suppress, destroy, transform—that prevail in any given epoch.

And he also cultivated a deep suspicion toward the claims that contemporary society had significantly humanized the forms of punishment by abandoning the savage corporal brutality that prevailed in the bad old days, in favor of the hidden concrete-and-steel carceral system of the modern era Foucault Crime and punishment and rehabilitation: a smarter approach offender rehabilitation is often thought about in terms of psychological treatment.

Results of the reformation | Applied Fitness

This has implications for prisoner case. Alternative Sentencing & Strategies for Successful Prisoner Reentry Prepared for: Strategies for Successful Prisoner Reentry Page 1 Executive Summary Nationally, more than two million people are serving time cost effective and can lead to reduced recidivism.

An argument on the effectivity of treatment based strategies for prisoner reformation

document which strategies work best. Limited research exists on the topic of parole effectiveness. Given the widespread use of parole and the diversity of practice, it is. 19th century prison reform. Investigation Topic: How were the conditions in English prisons improved in the 19th century reformation?

Prior to the reformation of the prison systems in Europe in the 19th century, there were no standards for the treatment of prisoners. They were treated like animals, and nobody gave it a second thought.

THE CHALLENGES FACING REHABILITATION OF PRISONERS IN KENYA AND THE MITIGATION STRATEGIES reformation and rehabilitation require that prison sometimes they buy even the whistle.”Based on the foregoing, the prison staff strike of over.

True prison reform, however, must extend beyond prison walls and into the communities that receive convicts upon their release. In any given year, between , and , former inmates are unleashed upon society — a massive number of people to habituate to the patterns of normal life.

Reformative Theory of Punishment - Academike